The Viability of the Short-Term Rental Business in an Economic Downturn

·Dominion Financial
image of a bedroom in a short term rental

The rise of platforms like Airbnb and VRBO has transformed the short-term rental industry, changing how people travel and find accommodations.

What began as a way for homeowners to earn extra income by renting out spare rooms or properties has evolved into a lucrative business model for real estate entrepreneurs, driven by the high rent per square foot these rentals can command.

Market Growth and Concerns:

The short-term rental market experienced rapid growth over the past decade, with Airbnb being founded in 2008. Entrepreneurs seized opportunities to generate higher rental returns by offering unique and specialized properties to cater to specific niches.

The market thrived during the COVID-19 pandemic as people sought alternative vacation options and traveling nurses looked for temporary housing. Real estate investors capitalized on this trend, often incorporating vacation rentals as part of their investment strategy.

However, concerns have arisen about the future of the short-term rental business. News headlines proclaiming “The Airbnb Bust” and discussions surrounding the industry’s resilience during a potential economic downturn have sparked worry among investors. The operational and financial risks associated with running short-term rentals make it a topic of debate among experts.

Financing and Loan Products:

In the early years of the short-term rental industry, acquiring financing for these properties was challenging. Traditional banks were skeptical of this business model and often considered short-term rentals as regular investment properties rather than an operational business.

However, as the market grew, loan products specifically tailored for short-term rentals emerged. These loans, known as Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) loans, enabled investors to secure financing based on the property’s 12-month market rent.

Loan Purchasers’ Perspectives:

The loan market for short-term rentals has fluctuated over time. Initially, lenders showed caution and applied higher interest rates due to the perceived risk of this business model.

However, as the market expanded and matured, some became more comfortable with these properties, while others removed them from their offerings altogether. Perspectives on their future performance vary, with some viewing them as behaving like single-family rentals during an economic downturn, while others liken them to hotels, making them more susceptible to market volatility.

Risks and Opportunities:

The short-term rental market’s risks are particularly apparent for less sophisticated operators and properties situated in less desirable locations. If occupancy rates drop significantly, operators may struggle to generate enough cash flow to cover mortgages.

An oversaturated market could further reduce profitability for property owners. Managing short-term rentals requires operational expertise and time commitment. Hobbyist investors often find these complexities overwhelming and difficult to navigate successfully.

As the market adjusts to potential downturns, opportunities may arise for investors looking to acquire distressed short-term rental properties. Distressed operators, unable to sustain their operations or eager to exit the market, may be willing to sell their properties at discounted prices. Savvy investors can capitalize on these opportunities to acquire properties with potential for long-term rental or other investment strategies by utilizing Dominion Financial’s 30-Year Rental Loan Program.

The future of the short-term rental business remains uncertain, with various factors influencing its performance. Concerns remain about the industry’s ability to withstand an economic downturn. Risks also arise from less experienced short-term rental operators. However, opportunities exist for investors who approach the market with caution. Conducting thorough due diligence can help mitigate these risks.

The market’s success often depends on factors like location and property uniqueness. Operators who adapt to changing conditions will likely fare better. Monitoring the industry closely and acting on opportunities is crucial for success.

Migration + Demographics: The Real Estate Thesis Supply Data Can't Replace
Market Insight

Migration + Demographics: The Real Estate Thesis Supply Data Can't Replace

Migration and demographic trends determine the long-term demand floor for a real estate market, while supply and absorption data explain shorter-term cyclical price and vacancy swings within that market. According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, 31 states had positive net domestic migration between July 2024 and June 2025, led by North Carolina (84,000+ net arrivals), Texas (67,300), South Carolina (66,600), and Tennessee (42,000+). Florida's net domestic migration dropped sharply to 22,517 in 2025, down from 310,892 in 2022, reflecting rising property taxes, insurance costs, and home prices eroding its pandemic-era affordability advantage. Meanwhile, the Midwest posted positive net domestic migration for the first time this decade. Investors should evaluate both migration trends and current supply/absorption conditions together, since a market can have strong migration and still be temporarily oversupplied, or weak migration and still be tight due to limited new construction.

October 19, 2026

Why "Normalized" Rates Don't Mean a Normal Housing Market
Market Insight

Why "Normalized" Rates Don't Mean a Normal Housing Market

As of September 2026, the 10-year Treasury yield (near 4.9-5%) and 30-year mortgage rates (around 6.67-6.76%) have returned to ranges considered historically normal by pre-2010 standards. Despite this, U.S. existing-home sales remain historically weak, falling to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.98 million in August 2026, with months' supply climbing to 4.9, the highest level in over a decade, according to the National Association of Realtors. The gap between "normal" rates and a still-frozen transaction market is driven primarily by the mortgage rate lock-in effect: homeowners who bought or refinanced at 2.5-3.5% during 2020-2021 face a strong financial disincentive to sell, since moving means giving up that rate for a new mortgage well above 6%. This lock-in effect unwinds gradually, driven by individual life events rather than rate changes, meaning transaction volume may stay subdued even if rates hold steady or ease modestly.

October 12, 2026

What the 2021-2022 Buying Spree Got Wrong (And Replacement Cost Would Have Caught)
Market Insight

What the 2021-2022 Buying Spree Got Wrong (And Replacement Cost Would Have Caught)

Institutional real estate investors who bought heavily in 2021-2022 often underwrote deals using IRR models and compressed cap rates that assumed cheap refinancing and aggressive rent growth would continue indefinitely. When interest rates rose and rent growth slowed, those assumptions broke down, and many of the same buyers became net sellers. Replacement cost, the cost to build a comparable property today, would have flagged those deals as overpriced regardless of interest rate assumptions, since it depends only on current land and construction costs rather than forecasts. As of 2024, construction costs made up a record 64.4% of a new home's average sales price in the U.S., according to the National Association of Home Builders, making replacement cost an increasingly useful underwriting benchmark for investors in 2026.

October 5, 2026