Unit Count Control: How Real Estate Investors Can Take Action Against the Proposed Legislation

·Dominion Financial
image of judge with a gavel

In recent years, a growing number of state legislators have introduced and shown support for bills that aim to limit the number of real estate properties that can be owned by certain entities, a concept known as unit count control. This unit count control has garnered significant attention in the real estate community. One of the most prominent of these proposed bills is the End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act of 2023. Originally introduced by U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (Oregon) and U.S. Rep. Adam Smith (Washington), it has since been cosponsored by legislators in Minnesota, Georgia, and California. 

The goal of this bill is to address concerns regarding the availability and affordability of housing, specifically single-family homes. It claims that larger real estate investors are making it difficult for middle-class homebuyers to find and afford homes in their communities. Therefore, the bill would limit the number of properties that large entities can own so that more homes would be available for individual homeowners. 

With that being said, are the bill’s claims well-founded? Would the limits on real estate investors actually help to make housing more affordable and accessible? Would more families be able to purchase simply because larger entities stopped buying?

Impact on Real Estate Market

Single-family housing, especially single-family rentals, has become an increasingly vital part of the real estate market. Homeownership is becoming less attainable for the average American, due to a mixture of rising home prices and stagnant income. After the pandemic, more families started seeking out single-family rentals with more space than apartments, demonstrating a drastic change in buyers’ needs. Real estate investors have filled the gap by offering rentals to individuals and families who prefer renting or simply can’t afford to purchase their own homes. While real estate investors have provided these homes for renters, legislation seeks to cap properties owned by a single entity.

Current Legislative Trends

Besides the End Hedge Fund Control bill mentioned above, many states have passed or introduced laws that limit the foreign ownership of single-family homes, which means investors from outside the United States may not be able to purchase them at all or may be limited in how many they can purchase. One major concern is that these laws are emerging in states supportive of housing development. Some of these states are Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia. 

Another growing trend in the real estate market includes build-to-rent (BTR) housing communities. In this case, investors build multiple single-family houses, typically with luxury amenities to mimic traditional gated communities. BTR housing has increased in popularity and some experts see BTR as the future of the real estate industry. However, real estate legislation would limit the ability of investors to own the number of houses in these communities. In addition, the Stop Wall Street Landlords Act of 2022 seeks to impose additional taxes and deny tax benefits to large investors who may be contributing to the development of these housing communities and other single-family housing units.

Legislative Implications for Investors

While real estate investors recognize that lawmakers are trying to address genuine issues related to housing affordability and supply, some argue that limitations on property ownership are not the right solution. In fact, they could do more harm than good. Unfortunately, the current proposed real estate legislation may inadvertently reduce the availability of rental housing, exacerbate affordability issues, and stifle investment in new housing developments.

For example, corporate investors may choose to purchase single-family homes and transform them into multi-unit buildings. When lawmakers limit investors’ ability to create new units, they reduce the number of units available to renters. This reduction in rental properties can drive up rents and make it harder for renters to find affordable housing. Additionally, restrictions may prevent investors from building new housing developments, such as BTR communities, further decreasing the number of houses available in a market already facing shortages.

Industry Response

To stop lawmakers from passing bills related to unit count control that could harm the real estate industry, leaders must be proactive in their response. Leaders can start by forming coalitions with other trade associations, such as home builders, realtors, and multifamily housing associations. Not only does this provide a united front against ill-informed lawmakers, but it also delivers insights into every aspect of the industry to help effectively communicate the potential negative impacts to legislators. 

Local leaders and stakeholders play an especially important part in communicating with lawmakers and creating change through a grassroots approach. Getting to know people in your community, educating them on the negative impacts of these laws, and encouraging them to speak directly with local lawmakers can have a huge impact on a bill’s outcome.

Education is a crucial part of our response to unit count control laws. In many cases, lawmakers lack a deep understanding of the single-family rental housing market, especially as it has evolved significantly in recent years. Industry leaders can inform lawmakers on the potential negative impacts of ownership restrictions, while also highlighting the positive impact of private investors on the single-family rental market. 

Understanding the industry’s dynamics, ownership structures, and economic impact is crucial for policymakers. This knowledge helps them make informed decisions about supported bills. Industry leaders must educate lawmakers about property ownership and management practices. They should also explain the essential role these properties play in the housing market.

Get Involved

The National Rental Home Council (NRHC) is a trade association that advocates for the single-family rental industry. It uses proactive advocacy, education, and coalition-building to spread awareness and provide support to industry leaders and residents alike. 

 

The NRHC’s State Chapter Program connects you with like-minded individuals in your area. Together, you can advocate for local policies and represent real estate investors and single-family rental residents. Building strong relationships with other leaders in your area allows you to share knowledge and offer support when needed. Current state chapters include Arizona, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas, but NRHC members are located all over the country. Consider joining a state chapter or working with NRHC leaders to start a local chapter in your area. 

Migration + Demographics: The Real Estate Thesis Supply Data Can't Replace
Market Insight

Migration + Demographics: The Real Estate Thesis Supply Data Can't Replace

Migration and demographic trends determine the long-term demand floor for a real estate market, while supply and absorption data explain shorter-term cyclical price and vacancy swings within that market. According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, 31 states had positive net domestic migration between July 2024 and June 2025, led by North Carolina (84,000+ net arrivals), Texas (67,300), South Carolina (66,600), and Tennessee (42,000+). Florida's net domestic migration dropped sharply to 22,517 in 2025, down from 310,892 in 2022, reflecting rising property taxes, insurance costs, and home prices eroding its pandemic-era affordability advantage. Meanwhile, the Midwest posted positive net domestic migration for the first time this decade. Investors should evaluate both migration trends and current supply/absorption conditions together, since a market can have strong migration and still be temporarily oversupplied, or weak migration and still be tight due to limited new construction.

October 19, 2026

Why "Normalized" Rates Don't Mean a Normal Housing Market
Market Insight

Why "Normalized" Rates Don't Mean a Normal Housing Market

As of September 2026, the 10-year Treasury yield (near 4.9-5%) and 30-year mortgage rates (around 6.67-6.76%) have returned to ranges considered historically normal by pre-2010 standards. Despite this, U.S. existing-home sales remain historically weak, falling to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.98 million in August 2026, with months' supply climbing to 4.9, the highest level in over a decade, according to the National Association of Realtors. The gap between "normal" rates and a still-frozen transaction market is driven primarily by the mortgage rate lock-in effect: homeowners who bought or refinanced at 2.5-3.5% during 2020-2021 face a strong financial disincentive to sell, since moving means giving up that rate for a new mortgage well above 6%. This lock-in effect unwinds gradually, driven by individual life events rather than rate changes, meaning transaction volume may stay subdued even if rates hold steady or ease modestly.

October 12, 2026

What the 2021-2022 Buying Spree Got Wrong (And Replacement Cost Would Have Caught)
Market Insight

What the 2021-2022 Buying Spree Got Wrong (And Replacement Cost Would Have Caught)

Institutional real estate investors who bought heavily in 2021-2022 often underwrote deals using IRR models and compressed cap rates that assumed cheap refinancing and aggressive rent growth would continue indefinitely. When interest rates rose and rent growth slowed, those assumptions broke down, and many of the same buyers became net sellers. Replacement cost, the cost to build a comparable property today, would have flagged those deals as overpriced regardless of interest rate assumptions, since it depends only on current land and construction costs rather than forecasts. As of 2024, construction costs made up a record 64.4% of a new home's average sales price in the U.S., according to the National Association of Home Builders, making replacement cost an increasingly useful underwriting benchmark for investors in 2026.

October 5, 2026