Bond Math & Negative Convexity

A little bond math to illustrate the value of fixed-rate mortgages and why the debt you’ve borrowed may be one of your greatest assets. As a real estate investor, you may not immediately think of your loans taken out as being favorable to you. However, the debt you borrowed over the last two years is actually one of the greatest assets in your portfolio. Why is that?
Over the last year, the 30-year fixed mortgage rate has climbed aggressively, more than doubling from 3.1% to almost 7%. If you were a lender, it has been a terrible year.
Mortgages with similar characteristics like loan size, loan-to-value (LTV), FICO credit scores get pooled together and traded in the market between banks, insurance companies, mortgage REITs, etc. These loans illustrate how much prices have aggressively moved down over a short period of time.
Let’s take a look at some basic bond math to determine how the value of your loan has changed dramatically, while diving into a unique feature of mortgages.
How To Determine Bond Value
To understand the price changes and quantify why lenders are hurting, let’s review a hypothetical example:
The loans you take out in your real estate business are simply bonds secured by real estate (usually owned by an entity that buys mortgages, like banks or insurance companies).
Let’s say a bondholder is holding a $100,000 loan and the interest rate is 6%, which is what it was at origination. But a lender can make virtually the same loan in the market now with similar terms at 7.5%. So why would another buyer buy this loan and only receive 6%, when the current market rate could be 7.5%?
To compensate, the bondholder is going to put a discount on the bond and sell it for less than $100,000. What’s the right discount that the bond should trade at?
Looking at the 6% original interest rate and the current market interest rate of 7.5%, you calculate a difference of 1.5% every year. This difference is what would be left on the table if you were to buy a loan offering 6%, even though the current market is at 7.5%. Then you consider how long this loan will stay outstanding – let’s say that it will pay off in 5 years. So over that period of time, 1.5% * 5 years = 7.5%
The discount on the loan price should be 7.5% and the bond price would be 100% – 7.5% = 92.5% of face value, which is the same as 92.5 cents on the dollar. That is the price a bond buyer would be willing to pay for this loan.
This loan price has dropped from 100 (par) at origination to 92.5 cents on the dollar.
You’ll notice that two main factors determine pricing: the interest rate (bond yield) and the amount of time the loan would be outstanding before it’s repaid (duration). Now let’s apply this to mortgages.
US Fixed-Rate Mortgages: Uniquely Favorable to Homeowners
Structurally, the value of fixed-rate mortgages makes them an incredible deal for American homeowners. We decided as a country that for the benefit of American society, homeowners could take out long-term, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. Not only that, but homeowners wouldn’t be locked in because they have the option to move or refinance at any time.
This is an amazing one-sided transaction favorable to the borrower, which does not happen in commercial transactions. It’s only available to the American homeowner. In some situations, the lender really ends up losing.
Increasing Duration
For the past 20 – 30 years, we’ve had declining interest rates.
Homeowners moved or refinanced every five to seven years to secure lower interest rates. Because of that free option to refinance, these 30 year loans have been paying off, on average, at a duration of every five to seven years.
However, in a rising interest rate environment, homeowners won’t give up the low interest rate they locked in for 30 years that easily. Maybe they’ll stay in a house for longer or choose not to refinance because rates are only going higher.
The mortgage interest rate has risen from 3.5% to 7%. As the gap widens, homeowners stay in loans longer. Mortgages now take 10 to 12 years to pay off. This duration is much longer than in the past 20 to 30 years.
Negative Convexity: Why Bondholders are Hurting
Mortgage bondholders face challenges as bond prices drop due to rising interest rates and opportunity costs. Borrowers keep loans longer, adding to bondholder losses. This combination creates a phenomenon called negative convexity. Negative convexity describes how bond prices and yields behave in a changing market. It refers to the graph showing bond yields versus prices.
As an example, mortgages originated back in December were worth par, or 100% of face value. Now they’ve gone from being worth 100% down to 62%. Credit quality is not an issue, but if a lender originated a loan at par last December, they have lost 38% because now it’s worth 62%. As a result, volatility and situational distress has started to creep into the economy based on this violent increase in rates. It’s a horrific environment to be lending in and bond buyers have been getting destroyed.
American mortgages exhibit negative convexity, creating risks for bondholders. Rising interest rates make these mortgages particularly challenging for lenders. Understandably, mortgage buyers and lenders have become a bit gun-shy. On the other hand, as a real estate investor, you can think of the price changes as how much you’ve effectively made on the loans taken out last year. Looking to finance your next purchase? Dominion offers competitive rates for rental, fix & flip, ground-up construction, and multifamily bridge loans.
Related Posts
View all Market Insight →
Migration + Demographics: The Real Estate Thesis Supply Data Can't Replace
Migration and demographic trends determine the long-term demand floor for a real estate market, while supply and absorption data explain shorter-term cyclical price and vacancy swings within that market. According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, 31 states had positive net domestic migration between July 2024 and June 2025, led by North Carolina (84,000+ net arrivals), Texas (67,300), South Carolina (66,600), and Tennessee (42,000+). Florida's net domestic migration dropped sharply to 22,517 in 2025, down from 310,892 in 2022, reflecting rising property taxes, insurance costs, and home prices eroding its pandemic-era affordability advantage. Meanwhile, the Midwest posted positive net domestic migration for the first time this decade. Investors should evaluate both migration trends and current supply/absorption conditions together, since a market can have strong migration and still be temporarily oversupplied, or weak migration and still be tight due to limited new construction.
October 19, 2026

Why "Normalized" Rates Don't Mean a Normal Housing Market
As of September 2026, the 10-year Treasury yield (near 4.9-5%) and 30-year mortgage rates (around 6.67-6.76%) have returned to ranges considered historically normal by pre-2010 standards. Despite this, U.S. existing-home sales remain historically weak, falling to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.98 million in August 2026, with months' supply climbing to 4.9, the highest level in over a decade, according to the National Association of Realtors. The gap between "normal" rates and a still-frozen transaction market is driven primarily by the mortgage rate lock-in effect: homeowners who bought or refinanced at 2.5-3.5% during 2020-2021 face a strong financial disincentive to sell, since moving means giving up that rate for a new mortgage well above 6%. This lock-in effect unwinds gradually, driven by individual life events rather than rate changes, meaning transaction volume may stay subdued even if rates hold steady or ease modestly.
October 12, 2026

What the 2021-2022 Buying Spree Got Wrong (And Replacement Cost Would Have Caught)
Institutional real estate investors who bought heavily in 2021-2022 often underwrote deals using IRR models and compressed cap rates that assumed cheap refinancing and aggressive rent growth would continue indefinitely. When interest rates rose and rent growth slowed, those assumptions broke down, and many of the same buyers became net sellers. Replacement cost, the cost to build a comparable property today, would have flagged those deals as overpriced regardless of interest rate assumptions, since it depends only on current land and construction costs rather than forecasts. As of 2024, construction costs made up a record 64.4% of a new home's average sales price in the U.S., according to the National Association of Home Builders, making replacement cost an increasingly useful underwriting benchmark for investors in 2026.
October 5, 2026